experiment log
Eval v2.1 — Curriculum expansion (S0.6 growth path)
- File
2026-07-03_eval_v2_1_expansion.md- Size
- 3.4 KB
- SHA-256
944fb38c527da7af…
Eval v2.1 — Curriculum expansion (S0.6 growth path)
Date: 2026-07-03
Approval: explicit human decision in-session ("address the gaps"), executed
per the standing agreement (deliberate change + version bump via
scripts/bump_eval_version.py). Manifest version: v2 → v2.1.
Authoring provenance: scripts/eval_expansion_v2_1.py (deterministic,
re-runnable); validated by validate_curriculum (0 errors, 0 warnings) and
validate_split (0 errors).
Why
The power gaps identified while pre-registering research/19
(and inherited by research/18): stage-0 holdout had 3 probes, stage-1
holdout had 1 — thinnest exactly on the transfer axis where learned-mapping
vs exemplar-lookup must be distinguished — and a trained head could saturate
stage 0 quickly (ceiling).
What was added (existing episodes/probes never modified or removed)
12 new ambiguous words threaded through stages 0/1/2 in the existing pattern (bare request → corrected non-tech sense; paraphrase transfer; context-qualified tech sense + scope back-probe): draft, pitch, bar, note, scale, bridge, port, crane, jam, seal, mole, organ.
- Stage 0: +12 episodes (8 → 20 episodes/probes).
- Stage 1: +12 episodes with 2 paraphrase probes each, and +1 extra cue-light paraphrase probe appended to each of the 8 original episodes (8 → 40 probes).
- Stage 2: +5 episodes (pitch, note, port, seal, organ: office/tech sense taught in context, scope probe pointing back at the stage-0 sense), and +4 adversarial paraphrase scope probes on existing episodes, where the surface verb cues the wrong domain ("Roll out the model." → fashion model; "Kick off the run." → river run) (16 → 30 probes).
- Stages 3, 4, 5 unchanged (their expansion deferred; noted as remaining gap).
Split impact (fraction=0.3, salt="v2" — parameters unchanged)
| Stage | v2 dev/holdout | v2.1 dev/holdout |
|---|---|---|
| 0 grounding | 5 / 3 (promoted) | 17 / 3 (raw-hash) |
| 1 transfer | 7 / 1 | 31 / 9 |
| 2 scope | 13 / 3 | 26 / 4 |
| 3 dialog | 5 / 3 | 5 / 3 |
| 4 consolidation | 6 / 4 | 6 / 4 |
| 5 cross-domain | 9 / 3 | 9 / 3 |
Disclosure — stage-0 holdout composition changed. In v2, stage 0's raw
thresholding produced an EMPTY holdout and the repaired guarantee promoted 3
probes. In v2.1, 3 of the 12 new probes hash below 0.3 on their own, so the
guarantee no longer engages and the 3 previously-promoted v2 probes revert to
dev. Existing probes' raw hash assignments were never altered — the
promotion was always conditional on emptiness. Consequence: S2.1's REFUTE
was measured on the promoted trio; experiments from v2.1 onward measure on
the raw-hash holdout. Both are recorded; neither is retroactively changed.
Regression locks updated: test_split_counts_locked_to_eval_v2_1.
Design notes
- New-word senses avoid all
PlasticCortex.BASELINEtokens (validated). - Stage-1 additions are the
research/19transfer battery's substrate: with stage 1 never taught and tuning confined to stage-0 dev, all 40 probes are legitimately untouched test items. - The 4 adversarial scope probes are the template/keyword-engine killers: correct answers require conditioning on the absence of domain qualification, against the surface verb's cue.
Remaining gaps (deferred, tracked)
Stages 3/4/5 unexpanded; no adversarial variants outside stage 2; external (non-repo-authored) benchmark still pending in research/16's battery.