experiment log

Eval v2.1 — Curriculum expansion (S0.6 growth path)

File
2026-07-03_eval_v2_1_expansion.md
Size
3.4 KB
SHA-256
944fb38c527da7af…
Primary source. This is the verbatim Oczy document. The analytical field notes on the research page interpret and summarize these sources.

Eval v2.1 — Curriculum expansion (S0.6 growth path)

Date: 2026-07-03 Approval: explicit human decision in-session ("address the gaps"), executed per the standing agreement (deliberate change + version bump via scripts/bump_eval_version.py). Manifest version: v2v2.1. Authoring provenance: scripts/eval_expansion_v2_1.py (deterministic, re-runnable); validated by validate_curriculum (0 errors, 0 warnings) and validate_split (0 errors).

Why

The power gaps identified while pre-registering research/19 (and inherited by research/18): stage-0 holdout had 3 probes, stage-1 holdout had 1 — thinnest exactly on the transfer axis where learned-mapping vs exemplar-lookup must be distinguished — and a trained head could saturate stage 0 quickly (ceiling).

What was added (existing episodes/probes never modified or removed)

12 new ambiguous words threaded through stages 0/1/2 in the existing pattern (bare request → corrected non-tech sense; paraphrase transfer; context-qualified tech sense + scope back-probe): draft, pitch, bar, note, scale, bridge, port, crane, jam, seal, mole, organ.

  • Stage 0: +12 episodes (8 → 20 episodes/probes).
  • Stage 1: +12 episodes with 2 paraphrase probes each, and +1 extra cue-light paraphrase probe appended to each of the 8 original episodes (8 → 40 probes).
  • Stage 2: +5 episodes (pitch, note, port, seal, organ: office/tech sense taught in context, scope probe pointing back at the stage-0 sense), and +4 adversarial paraphrase scope probes on existing episodes, where the surface verb cues the wrong domain ("Roll out the model." → fashion model; "Kick off the run." → river run) (16 → 30 probes).
  • Stages 3, 4, 5 unchanged (their expansion deferred; noted as remaining gap).

Split impact (fraction=0.3, salt="v2" — parameters unchanged)

Stage v2 dev/holdout v2.1 dev/holdout
0 grounding 5 / 3 (promoted) 17 / 3 (raw-hash)
1 transfer 7 / 1 31 / 9
2 scope 13 / 3 26 / 4
3 dialog 5 / 3 5 / 3
4 consolidation 6 / 4 6 / 4
5 cross-domain 9 / 3 9 / 3

Disclosure — stage-0 holdout composition changed. In v2, stage 0's raw thresholding produced an EMPTY holdout and the repaired guarantee promoted 3 probes. In v2.1, 3 of the 12 new probes hash below 0.3 on their own, so the guarantee no longer engages and the 3 previously-promoted v2 probes revert to dev. Existing probes' raw hash assignments were never altered — the promotion was always conditional on emptiness. Consequence: S2.1's REFUTE was measured on the promoted trio; experiments from v2.1 onward measure on the raw-hash holdout. Both are recorded; neither is retroactively changed. Regression locks updated: test_split_counts_locked_to_eval_v2_1.

Design notes

  • New-word senses avoid all PlasticCortex.BASELINE tokens (validated).
  • Stage-1 additions are the research/19 transfer battery's substrate: with stage 1 never taught and tuning confined to stage-0 dev, all 40 probes are legitimately untouched test items.
  • The 4 adversarial scope probes are the template/keyword-engine killers: correct answers require conditioning on the absence of domain qualification, against the surface verb's cue.

Remaining gaps (deferred, tracked)

Stages 3/4/5 unexpanded; no adversarial variants outside stage 2; external (non-repo-authored) benchmark still pending in research/16's battery.